Kingfisher Metals Confirms Early Jurassic Porphyry Mineralization Across Hank-Mary District, a Fertile Window Between Mitchell Cu-Au and Brucejack Au-Ag Deposits

Multiple U-Pb and Re-Os dates between 190–186 Ma establish that the Hank-Mary district formed within a minimum 4-million-year period during a key regional gold-rich mineralization window.  The closest age porphyry deposit is Mitchell (KSM), the largest Cu-Au porphyry deposit in Canada and the closest age epithermal deposit is Brucejack Au-Ag.

Kingfisher Metals Corp. (TSX-V: KFR) (FSE: 970) (OTCQB: KGFMF) (“Kingfisher” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce new U-Pb zircon and Re-Os molybdenum geochronology results from the Hank-Mary district on its 933 km² HWY 37 Project, Golden Triangle, British Columbia. The initial results demonstrate that magmatic-hydrothermal activity across the Hank-Mary district is part of highly fertile and gold-rich mineralizing time in the region. These dates overlap with established ages for the Mitchell porphyry deposit at the nearby KSM project, the largest undeveloped Cu-Au porphyry deposit in Canada and is close to the age of the Brucejack epithermal Au-Ag deposit (Table 1 & Figure 1 – 3).

Key Highlights:

  • Similar age as Mitchell Cu-Au porphyry deposit:  Porphyry mineralization at Hank, Williams & Mary (~190–186 Ma) overlaps with the Mitchell deposit (~196–189 Ma).
  • Similar timing to Brucejack Au-Ag epithermal deposit: Epithermal gold mineralization at Hank (~188-184 Ma) ties closely with the Brucejack deposit (~184–183 Ma).
  • One large system: Ages from Hank, Mary, and Williams all fall within the same range, suggesting a single, large mineralizing system that defines the district.
  • Geological age as a fertility indicator: These ages match the Early Jurassic Texas Creek intrusive suite of rocks, known for hosting major porphyry deposits in the Golden Triangle. 

Dustin Perry, CEO and President of Kingfisher, states, “These initial geochronology results validate our exploration model and confirm our belief that the Hank–Mary district represents a large, fertile porphyry system. The confirmation that mineralization across Hank, Mary, and Williams falls within the same Early Jurassic window as the Mitchell and Brucejack deposits highlights strong parallels to two of the most significant gold-rich systems in Canada.”

Figure 1: Regional map of the Golden Triangle showing the location of Kingfisher’s HWY 37 Project (Hank district) relative to Seabridge Gold’s KSM Project (Mitchell deposit) within the Sulphurets District.[1]

Geochronology Results

Two complementary dating methods applied across the Hank district from three studies:

U-Pb zircon geochronology constrains the crystallization age of host intrusions, the timing of magma emplacement, and is performed on zircon mineral separates from intrusive rock samples.

Re-Os molybdenite geochronology directly dates ore-forming hydrothermal events by measuring the radioactive decay of rhenium to osmium in molybdenite (MoS₂), a common porphyry mineral. Molybdenite often precipitates from later-stage hydrothermal fluids during mineralization, Re-Os ages are interpreted to reflect the youngest ages of porphyry mineralization. The results in Table 1 present new data from the British Columbia Geological Survey research by Roddy Campbell presented at Rock Talk 2026[2], new data from Kingfisher Metals and includes one previous result from the Williams deposit.

Table 1: Geochronology results from the Hank porphyry district, HWY 37 Project. Ma = million years ago.

AreaDrillholeMethodAge (Ma)Error (Ma)Source
Mary PorphyryBC07-10U-Pb zircon*190.1±0.024*Preliminary Result; Campbell, 2026
Mary PorphyryBC07-10Re-Os Mo186.3±0.76Campbell, 2026
Hank PorphyryHW-25-011Re-Os Mo187.7±1.1Kingfisher Metals, 2026
Hank PorphyryHW-25-006Re-Os Mo188.0±1.1Kingfisher Metals, 2026
Williams Porphyry188Friesen, 2020[3]

Figure 2: Hank district map showing porphyry centres (Hank, Mary, Williams) with geochronology sample locations and dates.

Interpretation: District and timing relative to the Mitchell and Brucejack deposits

District Scale

The similar-age results across Hank, Mary, and Williams (~190–186 Ma) are consistent with a district-scale magmatic centre capable of generating multiple porphyry deposits, analogous to the multi-phase, multi-centre architecture of the world’s largest porphyry districts.

Figure 3: Major magmatic and mineralization age groups in the Golden Triangle region (after Campbell, 2026, British Columbia Geological Survey). Hank-Mary and KSM data shown for comparison.

Mitchell

The Mitchell deposit (KSM project) has an interpreted span of mineralization ~192 to 190 Ma with youngest magmatism ending around 189 Ma[4]. Early results from the Hank district indicate porphyry mineralization is between 190 and 186 Ma, with overlap in age with the Mitchell porphyry. Mitchell is the closest in age porphyry system in the region, located approximately 75 km from Hank, and is Canada’s largest undeveloped Cu–Au deposit. This time window is considered highly prospective.

Brucejack

Epithermal gold at Hank emplaced after ~188 and before 184 Ma[5].  This timing ties closely with the nearby Brucejack deposit, where epithermal Au – veins are formed between 184-183 Ma[6]. Brucejack is the only known system in the region with this timing, making it a strong analogue for Hank. However, more work is needed to better define the exact age of gold mineralization at Hank.

Background: Geological Age and Porphyry Fertility

New and recently published geochronology places the Hank district in one of the most fertile periods in BC, between Mitchell porphyry (KSM) and Brucejack epithermal Au-Ag deposits. Within these prospective time windows in the region, multiple deposits can be mineralized simultaneously across a large district that is fed by a common district-scale magmatic hydrothermal system.

Geological age is a powerful predictor of porphyry copper-gold and epithermal Au-Ag fertility. In the Golden Triangle of northwestern British Columbia, some of the most significant Cu-Au porphyry deposits and epithermal Au-Ag deposits which include the world-class KSM system and nearby Brucejack deposit are genetically linked to Early Jurassic (~196–185 Ma) Texas Creek magmatism (Figure 3).

Qualified Person

Technical aspects of this news release have been reviewed, verified, and approved by Tyler Caswell, P.Geo., Vice President Exploration of Kingfisher, who is a qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Minerals Projects.

About Kingfisher Metals Corp.

Kingfisher Metals Corp. (https://kingfishermetals.com/) is a Canadian based exploration company focused on copper-gold exploration in the Golden Triangle, British Columbia. Through outright purchases and option earn in agreements (Orogen Royalties, Golden Ridge Resources, and Aben Gold) the Company has quickly consolidated one of the largest land positions in the Golden Triangle region with the 933 km2 HWY 37 Project and 202 km2 Forrest Kerr Project. Kingfisher also owns (100%) two district-scale orogenic gold projects in British Columbia that total 641 km2. The Company currently has 136,727,344 shares outstanding.

For further information, please contact:

Dustin Perry, P.Geo.
CEO and Director
Phone: +1 778 606 2507
E-Mail: info@kingfishermetals.com    

Neither the TSX-V nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX-V) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Mineralization hosted on adjacent and/or nearby properties is not necessarily indicative of mineralization hosted on the Company’s property. This news release contains statements that constitute “forward-looking statements.” Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements, or developments to differ materially from the anticipated results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,” “potential” and similar expressions, or that events or conditions “will,” “would,” “may,” “could” or “should” occur.

Forward-looking statements in this news release include, among others, statements relating to  the interpretation that geochronology results from the Hank-Mary district indicate a district-scale magmatic-hydrothermal system with porphyry mineralization ages (~190–186 Ma) overlapping those of the Mitchell Cu-Au and Brucejack Au-Ag deposits, suggestive of a similarly fertile mineralizing environment capable of hosting multiple porphyry deposits; and statements regarding planned exploration on the HWY 37 Project. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or other future events, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors and risks include, among others: the Company may require additional financing from time to time in order to continue its operations which may not be available when needed or on acceptable terms and conditions acceptable; compliance with extensive government regulation; domestic and foreign laws and regulations could adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations; the stock markets have experienced volatility that often has been unrelated to the performance of companies and these fluctuations may adversely affect the price of the Company’s securities, regardless of its operating performance.

The forward-looking information contained in this news release represents the expectations of the Company as of the date of this news release and, accordingly, is subject to change after such date. Readers should not place undue importance on forward-looking information and should not rely upon this information as of any other date. The Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements in the event that management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.


[1] KSM (Seabridge Gold) Seabridge Gold Inc., News Release dated March 31, 2026: “Seabridge Gold Provides Updated Mineral Resource Estimates for KSM Project.” Effective date of estimate: March 30, 2026. The MRE was prepared by independent qualified persons in accordance with NI 43-101.

Treaty Creek (Tudor Gold / Teuton) Tudor Gold Corp., News Release dated January 22, 2026: “Tudor Gold Announces Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for Treaty Creek Project.” Effective date of estimate: November 30, 2025.

Brucejack (Newmont) Newmont Corporation, News Release dated February 2026: “Newmont Announces 2025 Year-End Mineral Reserve and Resource Estimates.” Note: Newmont does not separately disclose deposit-level M+I+Inferred resource tables by category in their press release — the full technical disclosure is in Newmont’s Annual Information Form (AIF) and the supporting NI 43-101 Technical Report on file with SEDAR+.

Snip (Skeena Resources) Skeena Resources Ltd., News Release dated September 5, 2023: “Skeena Resources Delivers Updated Mineral Resource Estimate for the Snip Gold Project.” Effective date of estimate: September 5, 2023.

Bronson Slope (Seabridge Gold) Seabridge Gold Inc., News Release dated June 27, 2024: “Seabridge Gold Reports Mineral Resource Estimate for Bronson Slope.” Effective date on estimate: June 25, 2024.

Snip North (Seabridge Gold) Seabridge Gold Inc., News Release dated April 15, 2026: “Seabridge Gold Announces Maiden Mineral Resource Estimate for Snip North.” Effective date of estimate: April 15, 2026.

[2] Campbell, R.W., Gibson, K., Horvath, O., and van Straaten, B.I. (2026, February 17-19th). A framework for Late Triassic to Early Jurassic plutonism in the central Golden Triangle [Conference presentation]. Smithers Exploration Group ‘Rock Talk’ 2026 Smithers, BC, Canada.

[3] Friesen, O., 2020. 2019 Drilling and Geochemical Report on the Hank/Ball Creek Property, Located in the Liard Mining division, British Columbia, Assessment Report 38858 for Ministry of Energy and Mines, BC Geological Survey.

[4] Febbo, G. E., Kennedy, L. A., Nelson, J. L., Savell, M. J., Campbell, M. E., Creaser, R. A., Friedman, R. M., van Straaten, B. I., & Stein, H. J. (2019). The evolution and structural modification of the supergiant Mitchell Au-Cu porphyry, northwestern British Columbia. Economic Geology, 114(2), 303–324

[5] Kaip, A. W. (1993). Geology and alteration zonation of the Hank property, northwestern British Columbia (104G/1, 2) (M.Sc. thesis, University of British Columbia). Mineral Deposit Research Unit, University of British Columbia

[6] Board, M. et al. (2020), Geochronology of magmatism and epithermal gold mineralization at the Brucejack deposit, northwestern British Columbia, Economic Geology.

Kingfisher Outlines New Porphyry Target 6 km from Highway and Power, HWY 37 Project, Golden Triangle

Kingfisher Metals Corp. (TSX-V: KFR) (FSE: 970) (OTCQB: KGFMF) (“Kingfisher” or the “Company”) is pleased to report the delineation of a new porphyry drill target at the Turquoise target area (Figures 1-3). Interpretation of recently updated geophysical inversion datasets1 highlight a compelling subsurface target within the Company’s 933 km² HWY 37 Project, located in the Golden Triangle, British Columbia.

Key Highlights:

  • New near-surface porphyry copper – gold target identified at the Turquoise target area characterized by a 0.5 by 2.0 km chargeability anomaly. The magnetic vector amplitude inversion (MVI), direct current (DC) resistivity and the Mobile MagnetoTellurics (MMT) resistivity datasets all support the core target domain (Figure 2).
  • Majority of target area is covered by a landslide and glacial till, interpreted to cover the core porphyry alteration target with only discrete lateral alteration expressions at surface (Figure 1).   
  • Porphyry proximal indications include advanced argillic mineralogy (dickite and vuggy silica) on surface and high pyrite abundance near geophysical core target domain (Figure 1).
  • Target is near-surface and drill ready.

Dustin Perry, CEO of Kingfisher, states, “The Turquoise target is a direct result of our systematic exploration approach, which continues to unlock new opportunities across this underexplored yet highly prospective region of the Golden Triangle. The target is located within the emerging Hank–Mary district and only ~6 km from existing infrastructure. Turquoise represents a compelling new drill target that we’re excited to test this summer as we continue to build a strong pipeline of high-quality targets across the HWY 37 Project. “

Figure 1: Plan overview of the Turquoise Porphyry Target and Section A-A’ Location
Figure 2: Cross-section Turquoise Porphyry Target IP-chargeability, MVI amplitude, MMT resistivity, DC-resistivity results, and a compilation summary interpretation.

Turquoise Porphyry Target

A new porphyry target has been identified ~3.4 km east of the Hank Porphyry discovery hole (HW-25-011). The target is centered on a 0.5 by 2.0 km chargeability anomaly (> 12.0 mV/V) and is supported by the recent MMT inversion, and magnetic inversion products1. Geophysical patterns define a possible fluid upwelling or structural root to the anomaly, supported by coincident geophysical signatures and surface geology mapping. The scale of the target area is approximately 1 by 3.4 km, elongated to the northeast.

Geophysical Highlights:

  • IP Chargeability: A large, coherent chargeability anomaly extends to surface and is spatially coincident with mapped pyrite alteration. The anomaly forms a volume approximately 0.5 km wide, 0.5 km deep and 2.0 km long and could define a broad sulphide-rich system.  The peak chargeability values are 25 mV/V.
  • MVI Amplitude: A steep, low- to moderate-amplitude magnetic feature is interpreted to reflect a structural focus or a fluid flow pathway. This feature appears to focus on the core of the chargeability anomaly, refining the primary drill target.
  • Resistivity (MMT and DC): Integrated resistivity datasets define classic porphyry-style architecture:
    • A mushroom-shaped, low-resistivity (conductive) cap with values ranging between 25-100 ohm * m and dimensions of approximately 1.0 km deep, 4.0 km wide and 6.0 km long, coincident with mapped clay-rich alteration.  
    • Underlying low- to moderate-resistivity domains are interpreted as potential porphyry stockwork zones, with the central “stem” representing a central fluid upwelling within a broad alteration system.
    • Moderate resistivity at surface correlates with mapped siliceous advanced argillic alteration.

Surface Geology Highlights:

  • Mapping indicates a vector toward higher temperature alteration toward the core target. Advanced argillic mineralogy, including dickite and vuggy silica, has been identified above the chargeability anomaly and may indicate a porphyry-top position.
  • Sericite–chlorite-pyrite-quartz alteration observed at surface within the core target area is consistent with porphyry-style alteration observed at the Hank porphyry.
  • The projected surface expression of the core target is largely obscured by landslide and moraine cover. However, proximal outcrops report elevated pyrite contents (>5%), supporting the geophysical interpretation.
  • Representative prospecting and rock sampling in the valley remain limited due to extensive till and landslide cover.
Figure 3: Photograph of Turquoise Porphyry Target Area.

Qualified Person

Technical aspects of this news release have been reviewed, verified, and approved by Tyler Caswell, P.Geo., Vice President Exploration of Kingfisher, who is a qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Minerals Projects.

About Kingfisher Metals Corp.

Kingfisher Metals Corp. (https://kingfishermetals.com/) is a Canadian based exploration company focused on copper-gold exploration in the Golden Triangle, British Columbia. Through outright purchases and option earn in agreements (Orogen Royalties, Golden Ridge Resources, and Aben Gold) the Company has quickly consolidated one of the largest land positions in the Golden Triangle region with the 933 km2 HWY 37 Project and 202 km2 Forrest Kerr Project. Kingfisher also owns (100%) two district-scale orogenic gold projects in British Columbia that total 641 km2. The Company currently has 134,898,973 shares outstanding.

For further information, please contact:

Dustin Perry, P.Geo.
CEO, President, and Director
Phone: +1 778 606 2507
E-Mail: info@kingfishermetals.com    

Neither the TSX-V nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX-V) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Mineralization hosted on adjacent and/or nearby properties is not necessarily indicative of mineralization hosted on the Company’s property. This news release contains statements that constitute “forward-looking statements.” Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements, or developments to differ materially from the anticipated results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,” “potential” and similar expressions, or that events or conditions “will,” “would,” “may,” “could” or “should” occur.

Forward-looking statements in this news release include, among others, statements relating to expectations regarding the projects, and other statements that are not historical facts. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or other future events, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors and risks include, among others: the Company may require additional financing from time to time in order to continue its operations which may not be available when needed or on acceptable terms and conditions acceptable; compliance with extensive government regulation; domestic and foreign laws and regulations could adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations; the stock markets have experienced volatility that often has been unrelated to the performance of companies and these fluctuations may adversely affect the price of the Company’s securities, regardless of its operating performance.

The forward-looking information contained in this news release represents the expectations of the Company as of the date of this news release and, accordingly, is subject to change after such date. Readers should not place undue importance on forward-looking information and should not rely upon this information as of any other date. The Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements in the event that management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.

(1) See news release dated April 2, 2026, available at www.kingfishermetals.com and the Company’s profile at www.sedarplus.ca

Kingfisher Appoints Sharon G.K. Singh to Board of Directors

Kingfisher Metals Corp. (TSX-V: KFR) (FSE: 970) (OTCQB: KGFMF) (“Kingfisher” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce the appointment of Sharon G.K. Singh as an independent director of the Company.

Ms. Singh is a highly regarded lawyer with deep expertise in environmental, Indigenous, regulatory and governance matters, particularly in the mining and natural resource sectors. Her appointment further strengthens Kingfisher’s commitment to responsible exploration, strong Indigenous, community and stakeholder engagement, and robust ESG practices.

“Sharon brings an exceptional combination of legal, policy, and practical mining experience at a time when strong Indigenous partnerships, environmental stewardship, and regulatory clarity are critical to advancing projects in British Columbia,” said Dustin Perry, CEO and President of Kingfisher. “Her perspective will be invaluable as we continue to advance our unrivaled land position in the Golden Triangle.”

About Sharon G.K. Singh

Ms. Singh is a Partner and Co-Head of the Indigenous and Environment practices at McMillan LLP, where she advises leading companies on complex matters spanning environmental assessment, permitting, regulatory compliance, Indigenous relations, and ESG strategy. She has extensive experience supporting mining, energy, and infrastructure projects through all stages of development, from regulatory approvals and negotiating Indigenous agreements to developing governance frameworks aligned with long-term project success.

Her background includes experience with an international mining company and board service. She is consistently recognized as a leading Canadian lawyer by Lexpert, Chambers Global, and Legal 500 in disciplines including ESG, Indigenous, environmental, and mining law. Ms. Singh holds a Master of Laws, a Bachelor of Laws, and a Bachelor of Business (International Trade) and is called to the bar in multiple jurisdictions.

Ms. Singh commented, “I am pleased to be joining Kingfisher’s board at this important stage of the Company’s growth. I look forward to working with the board and management team to support the Company’s continuous progress towards its strategic objectives and commitment to responsible development.”

About Kingfisher Metals Corp.

Kingfisher Metals Corp. (https://kingfishermetals.com/) is a Canadian based exploration company focused on copper-gold exploration in the Golden Triangle, British Columbia. Through outright purchases and option earn in agreements (Orogen Royalties, Golden Ridge Resources, and Aben Gold) the Company has quickly consolidated one of the largest land positions in the Golden Triangle region with the 933 km2 HWY 37 Project and 202 km2 Forrest Kerr Project. Kingfisher also owns (100%) two district-scale orogenic gold projects in British Columbia that total 641 km2. The Company currently has 133,732,098 shares outstanding.

For further information, please contact:

Dustin Perry, P.Geo.
CEO, President, and Director
Phone: +1 778 606 2507
E-Mail: info@kingfishermetals.com    

Neither the TSX-V nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX-V) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This news release contains “forward-looking statements” identified by words such as “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,” “potential,” and similar expressions, or that events or conditions “will,” “would,” “may,” “could,” or “should” occur. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated, including: the need for additional financing on acceptable terms; compliance with government regulation; changes in domestic and foreign laws that could adversely affect operations; and stock market volatility unrelated to the Company’s performance. These statements reflect the Company’s expectations as of the date of this release and are subject to change. The Company undertakes no obligation to update forward-looking statements should management’s beliefs, estimates, or other factors change.

Multiple Geophysical Datasets Support Increased Target Dimensions at Hank Copper-Gold Discovery, HWY 37 Project, Golden Triangle

Kingfisher Metals Corp. (TSX-V: KFR) (FSE: 970) (OTCQB: KGFMF) (“Kingfisher” or the “Company”) is pleased to announce that new and updated geophysical inversion datasets support a robust porphyry copper-gold target within the Hank Cu-Au discovery area. Results include a new Mobile MagnetoTellurics (MMT) and magnetic survey with inversions, newly compiled, leveled and merged airborne magnetic data, updated IP chargeability and direct current (DC) resistivity 3D inversions, along with new petrographic data from geological thin sections. These new and improved datasets provide Kingfisher with five additional data-layers integrated into a 3-dimensional targeting framework. Analysis of these datasets supports the scale and prospectivity of the porphyry Cu-Au discovery at Hank. The Hank discovery is within the 933 km2 HWY 37 Project located within the Golden Triangle, British Columbia.

Key Highlights:

  • The magnetic vector inversion (MVI) model outlines a large alteration footprint, interpreted as magnetite destruction and remanent magnetization, consistent with surface and drill core observations.
  • Expanded IP-resistivity surveys reveal a >2 km wide anomaly coinciding with the interpreted potassic altered core.
  • MMT and DC-resistivity results highlight a significant low resistivity anomaly (below 50 ohmm) over an area of approximately 3.5 by 4.4 km, interpreted as hydrothermal clay alteration related to the Hank system.
  • Petrographic analysis of thin sections from hole HW-25-011 show that hydrothermal alteration has destroyed magnetite and reveals high fertility indicators, including bornite and tennantite.

Dustin Perry, CEO and President of Kingfisher, states, “Over the past three years we have systematically explored the Hank area with multiple geophysical, geological, geochemical, and spectral surveys. These updated datasets provide even more confidence going into the 2026 field program where we seek to aggressively expand upon the newest Cu-Au porphyry discovery in BC’s Golden Triangle.”

Figure 1: Plan view of the Hank-Williams area with reduced to pole magnetics (RTP) in the background. Grey lines show IP-resistivity lines. Inset map on the right presents the HWY 37 tenure outline with compiled, leveled and merged RTP data in the background.
Figure 2: Cross section A-A’ illustrating IP-chargeability, magnetic vector inversion amplitude, MMT resistivity, DC-resistivity results, and a compilation summary interpretation.
Figure 3: Cross section B-B’ illustrating IP chargeability, magnetic vector inversion amplitude, MMT resistivity, DC-resistivity results, and a compilation summary interpretation.
Figure 4: Long section C-C’ illustrating IP chargeability, magnetic vector inversion amplitude, MMT resistivity, DC-resistivity results, and a compilation summary interpretation.
Figure 5: A) early potassic alteration near syn-mineral dyke overprinted by magnetite-destructive alteration; B) electrum grain ~10 microns enclosed by pyrite, replaced to chalcopyrite; C) ~10 micron electrum grain enclosed by chalcopyrite; D) bornite-chalcopyrite emulsion texture near syn-mineral dyke; and E) quartz vein with chalcopyrite-tennantite-electrum.

Summary & Discussion

In 2025, Expert Geophysics Ltd. conducted an 1825.0 line-km MMT survey, with data provided to Moombarriga Geoscience for 3D inversion. Peter E. Walcott & Associates Ltd. completed 22.3 line-km of IP-resistivity surveying. The resulting IP-resistivity data, combined with historical and 2024 data, produced a unified 3D inversion model of resistivity and chargeability for much of the Hank-Williams target area. Hardrock Geophysics Inc. compiled, leveled, and merged all historical airborne magnetic datasets within the HWY 37 tenure, which were then used for 3D magnetic susceptibility and magnetic vector (MVI) inversions.

Integrating geophysical products with diamond drilling, surface geochemistry, geological mapping, and petrography enables new targeting insights. By combining and interpreting these datasets within a porphyry-epithermal framework, a cohesive core porphyry target area has been identified. This integration has led to several significant observations:

  • A large area of possible porphyry-related magnetite destruction is inferred from magnetic data and surface geology.
    • RTP magnetics show a broad, moderate magnetic response in the Hank area (Figure 1). This zone also appears in other magnetic inversion products and aligns with mapped surface alteration.
    • Other datasets confirm a large volume of altered rock marked by magnetite loss and potential remanent magnetization. Cross sections (Figures 2–4) show the extent of the alteration, with high chargeability highlighting a core target. Drillhole HW-25-011 confirmed significant mineralization matching magnetic, chargeability, and resistivity anomalies.
    • Abundant pyrite and sericite at surface and in HW-25-011 support magnetite destruction, including high pyrite-to-chalcopyrite ratios. These features match flanking phyllic alteration.
    • Petrographic and drill core analysis further confirm magnetite destructive sericite-quartz-pyrite alteration assemblages in HW-25-011 (Figure 5).
  • Figures 2-4 show that resistivity sections from the MMT and DC-resistivity surveys outline a broad, low-angle blanket of low-resistivity (conductive) rock. This blanket lies above and to the side of the core target area, which is defined by coincident chargeability and magnetic anomalies.
    • This low-resistivity (conductive) anomaly, clearly mapped in the sections, is interpreted as an area of widespread clay alteration associated with the porphyry-epithermal mineral system.
    • A pronounced, mushroom-shaped conductivity zone marks a fluid pathway in the porphyry-epithermal system.
  • Volumes of moderate resistivity lie beneath the low resistivity anomaly in the DC-resistivity sections (Figures 2-4). These areas are near or overlap the chargeability anomalies. They may be intrusive porphyry stocks that are more resistant than the surrounding clay-altered wall rock.

Hank Porphyry Petrographic Study

Petrographic analysis of the Hank porphyry confirmed complex mineralogy near syn-mineral intrusions and widespread magnetite-destructive alteration (Figure 5). Narrow, syn-mineral intrusions host bornite and tennantite along with chalcopyrite, indicating a fertile system.  Electrum is also identified as 5-10 micron-sized grains near these intrusions, closely associated with copper minerals including bornite, chalcopyrite and tennantite.

Investor Relations Engagements

The Company entered into an investor relations consulting agreement with Adelaide Capital Markets Inc. (“Adelaide“) dated March 1, 2026, for various investor relations services at an aggregate cost of C$8,000 per month, payable monthly, subject to acceptance by the TSX Venture Exchange (the “TSXV”).

The agreement has an initial term commencing March 1, 2026, and ending April 30, 2027, and will automatically renew on a month-to-month basis thereafter unless terminated in accordance with its terms. Adelaide is an arm’s length consultant and was previously granted 35,000 stock options that have fully vested. To the knowledge of the Company, both Adelaide and Deborah Honig, President of Adelaide, own shares of Kingfisher. Neither the Company nor any of its directors, officers or employees have any interest, directly or indirectly, in Adelaide, or their securities, or any right or intent to acquire such an interest. Adelaide manages a marketing team headquartered in Toronto, Ontario, and has been successfully providing services for a broad range of companies listed on the TSXV.

Stock Option Grant

The Company announces the grant of 4,375,000 stock options to certain directors, officers, employees, and consultants pursuant to the Company’s stock option plan. This includes 75,000 stock options granted to Adelaide. The stock options are exercisable for a period of five (5) years at an exercise price of C$0.66 per share and will vest over a period of twenty-four (24) months. The stock options were granted as part of Kingfisher’s ongoing efforts to attract and retain key personnel and provide long-term performance incentives.

Qualified Person

Technical aspects of this news release have been reviewed, verified, and approved by Tyler Caswell, P.Geo., Vice President Exploration of Kingfisher, who is a qualified person as defined by National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Minerals Projects.

About Kingfisher Metals Corp.

Kingfisher Metals Corp. (https://kingfishermetals.com/) is a Canadian based exploration company focused on copper-gold exploration in the Golden Triangle, British Columbia. Through outright purchases and option earn in agreements (Orogen Royalties, Golden Ridge Resources, and Aben Gold) the Company has quickly consolidated one of the largest land positions in the Golden Triangle region with the 933 km2 HWY 37 Project and 202 km2 Forrest Kerr Project. Kingfisher also owns (100%) two district-scale orogenic gold projects in British Columbia that total 641 km2. The Company currently has 133,732,098 shares outstanding.

For further information, please contact:

Dustin Perry, P.Geo.
CEO, President, and Director
Phone: +1 778 606 2507
E-Mail: info@kingfishermetals.com    

Neither the TSX-V nor its Regulation Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX-V) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Mineralization hosted on adjacent and/or nearby properties is not necessarily indicative of mineralization hosted on the Company’s property. This news release contains statements that constitute “forward-looking statements.” Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the Company’s actual results, performance or achievements, or developments to differ materially from the anticipated results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts and are generally, but not always, identified by the words “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” “projects,” “potential” and similar expressions, or that events or conditions “will,” “would,” “may,” “could” or “should” occur.

Forward-looking statements in this news release include, among others, statements relating to expectations regarding the projects, and other statements that are not historical facts. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or other future events, to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Such factors and risks include, among others: the Company may require additional financing from time to time in order to continue its operations which may not be available when needed or on acceptable terms and conditions acceptable; compliance with extensive government regulation; domestic and foreign laws and regulations could adversely affect the Company’s business and results of operations; the stock markets have experienced volatility that often has been unrelated to the performance of companies and these fluctuations may adversely affect the price of the Company’s securities, regardless of its operating performance.

The forward-looking information contained in this news release represents the expectations of the Company as of the date of this news release and, accordingly, is subject to change after such date. Readers should not place undue importance on forward-looking information and should not rely upon this information as of any other date. The Company undertakes no obligation to update these forward-looking statements in the event that management’s beliefs, estimates or opinions, or other factors, should change.